ABSTRACT
Objective:
We aimed to investigate the parameters of complete blood count and the levels of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in children with allergic conjunctivit and to evaluate their role in diagnosis in this study.
Method:
We included 71 pediatric patients with allergic conjunctivit diagnosis referred from the ophthalmology outpatient clinics who had sensitivity to at least one allergen and 71 age- and sex-matched healthy controls and compared complete blood count results, immunoglobulin E (IgE), neutrophil/lymphocyte, and platelet/lymphocyte ratios and systemic immune-inflammation index results. We built a multivariate model with correlated results.
Results:
Eosinophil counts and serum total IgE values were significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (p<0.001). Other parameters were not statistically different. 70.4% (n=50) of the patients had seasonal allergic conjunctivit, and 29.6% (n=21) had perennial allergic conjunctivit. In the skin prick tests performed in the patient group, 60.6% (n=43) of the patients had pollen, 54.9% (n=39) mite, 12.7% (n=9) dander, 11.3% (n=8) cockroach, and 4.2% (n=3) had alternaria sensitivities. In the multivariate analysis, every 100-cell increase in eosinophil count increased the hazard ratio of allergic conjunctivitis 1.3 times (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.5), and every 100-units increase in total IgE levels increased 1.2 times (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.5).
Conclusion:
We found no significant relationship between neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratios, and SII with allergic conjunctivit. Increasing eosinophil count and serum total IgE levels increase the hazard ratio for developing allergic conjunctivit. Pollen sensitivity was the most common factor in the skin test in allergic conjunctivit-diagnosed patients.
Introduction
Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) progresses with symptoms such as eye itching, watering, redness, and eyelids edema (1). Although AC is a frequently encountered disorder, many ocular diseases with overlapping clinics in their differential diagnosis create difficulties in the diagnosis phase. The classification of different forms of ocular allergy was recently revised by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2). The conjunctival allergy forms with an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reaction, including benign seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) and perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC), as well as severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis and atopic keratoconjunctivitis involving the cornea (2,3). The most common type is SAC among AC, and PAC is the second most common (1). The frequency of AC has been increasing in recent years. There is no single reason for this increase, but many genetic/environmental factors, such as atopic susceptibility/family history, air pollution, and allergen exposure in early childhood, play a role (4). Although epidemiological studies are limited, it affects up to 25% of European children (3) and 28% of Chinese children (5).
In AC, the clinical picture develops with an IgE-mediated reaction against an allergen (1). As a result of the binding of the allergen to specific IgE, mast cells in the conjunctiva degranulate. In addition to mast cells, eosinophils, and Th2 lymphocytes play an important role in the inflammatory response that occurs in this process (3). In addition, neutrophils and platelets are blood parameters that have important functions in the inflammatory process. The easy accessibility of these blood parameters in today’s conditions allows them to be used in diagnosing and following-up on many diseases. Studies have shown that neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (TLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) parameters obtained from complete blood count parameters have prognostic importance in cardiovascular diseases, chronic inflammatory diseases, and various malignancies and can be used as inflammatory markers (6-8).
Studies suggest that hemogram parameters are important in allergic diseases such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis diagnosis and follow-up (9-11); however, studies on the use of these parameters in the diagnosis and follow-up of AC are limited (12,13). We aimed to investigate the parameters of complete blood count and the levels of systemic inflammatory biomarkers in children with AC and to evaluate their role in diagnosis in this study.
Materials and Methods
We included 71 pediatric patients referred to the pediatric allergy clinic from the ophthalmology outpatient clinics with AC diagnosis between March 2022 and May 2023 who had sensitivity to at least one allergen and 71 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We retrospectively analyzed the complete blood count parameters, serum total IgE levels, and skin prick test results of the cases during active complaints and evaluated neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet counts, and mean platelet volume, and hemoglobin and serum total IgE levels. We calculated NLR and PLR values by dividing the neutrophil and platelet counts by the absolute lymphocyte counts, respectively, and SII using the (neutrophil×platelet)/lymphocyte formula.
Patients whose skin prick tests showed sensitivity and developed symptoms such as itching, watering, burning, redness, and eye rubbing after exposure to these aeroallergens were defined as SAC, and patients with persistent symptoms throughout the year as PAC. Patients who received systemic or ocular/topical treatment for any reason (including AC), had systemic/ocular acute or chronic disease (including vernal keratoconjunctivitis, giant papillary conjunctivitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis) other than AC, and had signs of active infection excluded from the study. We obtained the study approval from University of Health Sciences Turkey, Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital Ethics Committee (date: 29.03.2023, number: 2023/514/246/22) and conducted the study in adherence to the Helsinki criteria. In the skin prick test, skin reactions of 3 mm or more from the negative control at the 15th minute after application with standardized inhaled allergens were considered positive.
Statistical Analysis
We analyzed the data with JAMOVI 2.3.18 statistical package program. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for presentation. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Student’s t-test for parametric continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. We used a generalized linear model (GLM) for multivariate analysis with skewed data and assessed significant confounding factors (p<0.01 considered for significance) with the stepwise method. A type 1 error for p<0.05 was considered for statistical significance.
Results
We included 71 AC patients (36 females and 35 males) and 71 healthy controls (37 females and 34 males), and the mean ages of the patient and control groups were 11.3±3.7 years and 10.9±3.9 years, respectively, with no statistical differences either for gender and age (p=0.740, chi-square test, and p=0.396, Mann-Whitney U test, respectively). There was no statistical difference between the patient and control groups by hemoglobin, mean platelet volume and white blood cell, red blood cell, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and thrombocyte counts, and NLR, TLR, and SII values (p>0.05). Eosinophil counts and serum total IgE values were significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (p<0.001) (Table 1). A total of 70.4% (n=50) of the patients had SAC, and 29.6% (n=21) had PAC diagnosis. In the skin prick tests performed in the patient group, 60.6% (n=43) of the patients had pollen, 54.9% (n=39) mite, 12.7% (n=9) dander, 11.3% (n=8) cockroach, and 4.2% (n=3) had alternaria sensitivities.
Eosinophil count and total IgE had significant correlations with the patient group but there was no significant correlation by other laboratory parameters (Table 2).
We created a multiple regression model using laboratory parameters (eosinophils and total IgE) as possible confounders. Every 100-cell increase in eosinophil count increased the risk of AC (hazard ratio) 1.3 times (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.5), and every 100-units increase in total IgE levels increased 1.2 times (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.5) (GLM, R2: 0.225). The related graph and the estimated marginal means table are presented below (Figure 1, Table 3).
Discussion
The incidence of allergic diseases in childhood increases significantly, and AC is one of the most common ocular diseases in clinical practice (14). AC is divided into SAC, where symptoms occur seasonally, and PAC, where symptoms persist throughout the year (15,16). Cellular reactions, mediators, and immunological events that play a role in the pathogenesis of AC have begun to be better understood (17,18). A study stated that eosinophils are the main effective cells in AC, and their interaction between cells through physiologically active substances (for example, histamine and leukotriene), cytokines, and chemokines is influential (15). Also, innate immunity contributes to this reaction with kerato-conjunctival cells, which play a role in the etiology through chemokine production (15).
The relationship between NLR and PLR in childhood and various inflammatory diseases has been shown in many studies (19,20). Studies also emphasized that NLR and PLR can be used as markers of inflammation in many allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis (9,21,22). Faria et al. (23) showed that NLR is closely related to ocular pathologies such as macular degeneration, glaucoma, and retinal vascular diseases.
A study conducted with 26 patients and 31 healthy control in Turkey compared hemogram parameters and systemic inflammatory markers and did not find a significant difference in results between groups in this study, and high NLR, PLR, and SII levels did not have an association with AC in the pediatric age group, similar to our study (13). Also, Kurtul et al. (12) reported no significant difference between SAC-diagnosed patients and controls in terms of NLR rates. In our study, while eosinophil counts were statistically significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group, the results of other hemogram parameters and systemic inflammatory markers did not differ. We think the low number of patients and mild allergic symptoms in most cases were effective in these results.
Although AC is a clinical diagnosis, laboratory tests support the diagnosis. Cytological examination, skin prick tests, and serum total IgE antibody detection are important in AC diagnosis (24). IgE plays a role in allergic diseases like in many immunological diseases (25,26). In many studies conducted on patients with AC, serum total Ig E levels were elevated, consistent with our results (12,27). In addition, in the multiple regression model, every 100-unit increase in total IgE levels increased the hazard ratio of AC by 1.2 times. Also, studies reported that pollen sensitivity was the most common cause of skin tests in patients with AC, consistent with our result (15,28).
Study Limitations
The limitations of our study were its retrospective and single-centered design and the small number of patients.
Conclusion
We did not find a significant relationship between NLR, PLR, and SII levels between AC and the control group in the pediatric age. Multicenter, prospective and longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate this topic. In addition, increasing eosinophil count and serum total IgE levels increase the hazard ratio of developing AC, and pollen sensitivity was the most common factor in the skin test in AC-diagnosed patients.
Ethics
Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Health Sciences Turkey, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital on March 29, 2023 with the decision number 2023/514/246/22.
Informed Consent: Not necessary.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions
Concept: F.Ç., M.T.K., Design: F.Ç., M.T.K., Data Collection or Processing: M.T.K., İ.K., Analysis or Interpretation: F.Ç., İ.K., Writing: F.Ç., M.T.K., İ.K., Drafting Manuscript: F.Ç., M.T.K., Critical Revision of Manuscript: F.Ç., M.T.K., İ.K., Final Approval and Accountability: F.Ç., M.T.K., İ.K., Technical or Material Support: F.Ç., M.T.K., Supervision: F.Ç., M.T.K., İ.K.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.