ABSTRACT

Objective:

The columellar strut graft (CSG) can help to correct nasal tip (NT) deformities in rhinoplasty. The value of using the CSG technique as a routine procedure in rhinoplasty is still being debated. The reason for this ambivalence is the increased rotation effect of a CSG on the NT. In this article, “b” (small letter “B”) shaped CSG was prepared differently from the traditional CSG, and two different designs of CSGs were compared in terms of nasolabial angles.

Method:

A total of 99 patients who were operated on using CSG between September 2018 and March 2020 were included in this study. We analyzed preoperative and postoperative lateral views of photographs and case histories of 99 patients. Traditional shape and b-shaped CSGs were used for 33 (33.3%) and 66 (66.6%) of the total patients, respectively. The groups of traditional shaped and b-shaped CSGs were compared with statistical analysis.

Results:

When postoperative nasolabial angles were evaluated, it was found that 36.4% and 7.6% of the nasolabial angles were above the optimal range in the traditional strut graft group and b-shaped CSG group, respectively. Wide-nasolabialangles were observed to be more common in cases with traditional strut grafts than in cases with b-Shaped CSG. The b-shaped CSG provided gain optimal projection without extended rotation. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.00).

Conclusion:

The overall conclusion derived from this research is that an optimally shaped columella can be obtained using a b-shaped CSG without overrotation of the NT.

Keywords:

Columella reconstruction, columellar strut graft, open rhinoplasty

Introduction

Tip control is critical to the functional and cosmetic outcomes of rhinoplasty (1). In rhinoplasty, nasal function and nasal tip (NT) support should be preserved (2). If the NT is left unsupported during surgery, loss of the NT projection and NT ptosis are observed at a high rate; as a result of these, nasal airway obstruction can occur (3).

The columella provides a balanced relationship between the alar rim on both sides and the medial cruras (1). The lateral view of the columella should not retract and overhang for satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. The natural and well-shaped columella provides a pleasant lateral aspect.

In previous studies, there are various methods to increase NT support. A columellar strut graft (CSG) is used to increase NT support (4). Other techniques are caudal extension graft, extended CSG, suturing the medial crura to a long caudal septum, and suspension of lower lateral cartilage to the upper lateral cartilage with suture administration (1). All of the methods that are mentioned above lead to some complications associated with the NT and caudal part of the nose. Retracted columella, the stiffness of the NT, over-rotation of the NT, and acute nasolabial angle (NLA) are the most common complications in the literature (1,5). The value of using the CSG technique as a routine procedure in rhinoplasty is still being debated. The reason for this ambivalence is the increased rotation effect of a CSG on the NT (6).

The upperlip, pre-maxilla, anterior nasal spine, columella and nasal base have complex anatomical relations and variable anthropometrical measurements (8). Preoperative assessment of all facial elements is important to creating harmony of the face. Several measurements are used for the assessment of anthropometrical relations. NLA is an essential parameter of preoperative and postoperative measurement. NLA indicates the quantification of NT rotation and tip position (9). Therefore, NLA measurement was used to detect NT rotation in this study.

The traditional strut’s shape was believed to cause excessive NT rotation, thus the strut was created with a modified shape. In this research, “b” (small letter “B”) shape CSG was prepared differently from the traditional CSG and two different designs of columellar strut were compared in terms of NLA and lateral columellar views. In this study, we wanted to present the results of the b-shaped CSG.

Materials and Methods

The essential approval was obtained to use the hospital database. Ethical approval was obtained from the Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Medicine for the study (number: 08-07, date: 28/04/2021). A total of 99 patients who operated open approach rhinoplasty with using CSG were included in this study during the period of September 2018 to March 2020. The research included all patients older than 18 who underwent a rhinoplasty procedure utilizing a traditional or b-shaped strut over the time period specified above. Thus, other changes in the NLA were standardized. Demographic features of patients, a type of CSG which was used, preoperative-postoperative NLA, and postoperative follow-up periods were recorded. The patient should be rotated until the philtral columns are aligned to have standardized lateral view photographs were taken by the same surgeon. The patients’ photographs that were preoperatively and postoperatively (2 weeks-1 month-3 months-6 months-1 year) were examined. The patients’ photographs which were preoperatively and postoperatively (2 weeks-1 month-3 months-6 months-1 year) were examined.

The optimal NLA was determined to be between 95 and 105 degrees, according to the literature. The measurements were taken by an impartial researcher who was not aware of the procedure using retrospective digital preoperative and postoperative photographs. The degree of NLA was analyzed objectively using two defined lines superimposed on the lateral profile of the face. The 1^stline was drawn parallel to the upper lip, and the 2^nd line was drawn as the projection of the columella. The NLA between the first line and the second line was measured using Synedra View Personal Version 20.0.0.4 (x64 Community Edition).

Operative Technique

Before the rhinoplasty treatment, a local solution was administered to the subperiosteal and subperichondrial planes under general anesthesia. For the open method, a “W” incision was performed. Nasal skin and soft tissue were harvested from the Osseo-cartilage framework, and then the nasal dorsum was exposed. The septum was dissected subperichondrally, and a cartilaginous graft was created from the septal cartilage. The harvested graft was carved in a “b” shape. The dimensions of the thin part of the b-shaped CSG were approximately 1.5 cm x 0.5 cm, while the dimensions of the distal part of the strut graft were 0.5 cm x 0.7 cm (Figure 1A). During NT plasty, a pocket was formed between the medial crura of the alar cartilages. The pocket was prepared in a way that the distal part of the CSG would fit into it without accessing the anterior nasal spine (Figure 1B). The CSG was positioned in the prepared pocket. The protruding part of the strut graft was toward the skin, and the bottom part of the b-shaped CSG was located from a third of the distal portion of the columella towards the anterior nasal spine. A polypropylene suture was passed from one medial crura to the distal third of the thin part of the b-shaped CSG, and then it was passed to the other medial crura and tied on one side of the strut graft.

Figure 1

The reduction of the dorsal hump and narrowing of the nasal bone base were performed by nasal osteotomies. Reshaping and refinement of the NT were performed using sutures. After final inspection and palpation, the incisions in the skin were closed. Both groups had the same key surgical methods and approaches to rhinoplasties.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and and a p-value less than 5% was considered statistically significant. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups for statistical differences. Firstly, it was examined whether the data has a normal distribution or not with Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Since the data did not show normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare two independent measurements. The independent t-test was used to determine whether there was a statistical difference in NLA between the two groups.

Results

We evaluated the preoperative and postoperative lateral view images and case histories of 99 patients who had open rhinoplasty in this retrospective analysis (Figures 2, 3). There were 61 female patients and 38 male participants in the research. The patients’ average age was 23 (r=18-53) (Table 1). None of the patients had comorbidities such as diabetes or hypertension, while four patients had a history of smoking. The mean follow-up was 17.3 months. Traditionally shaped and b-shaped struts were used for 33 (33.3%) and 66 (66.6%) of the patients, respectively (Table 2). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in age, gender, or follow-up period.

Figure 2

Figure 3

Table 1

Table 2

When the postoperative NLAs were evaluated, it was found that 36.4% and 7.6% of the NLAs were above the optimal range in the traditional strut graft group and in the b-shaped CSG group, respectively (Table 3). The mean postoperative NLA with the traditionally shaped columellar strut was 104.12±9.23, while the mean postoperative NLA with the b-shaped columellar strut was 95.93±6.93. A statistically significant difference was found between the postoperative NLAs (p=0.00) (Table 4). When the measurement was compared between the traditional strut graft group and b-shaped strut graft group, optimal NT rotation was obtained without increasing the NLA degree over the optimal degree in the b-shaped CSG group, unlike the traditional strut graft group.

Table 3

Table 4

Complications such as hematoma, wound infection, and skin necrosis were not observed. In the b-shaped CSG group, columella, stiffness of the NT, over-rotation of the NT, and acute NLA were not observed. Only one patient was able to feel the prominent distal part of the b-shaped CSG, but it was not visible. Thus, any revision procedure was not demanded.

Discussion

NT integrity that is formed by healthy and stable attachment is important to ensure good nasal function and to avoid aesthetic problems (7). However, correction of the NT deformity requires a complex procedure and control of the long-term view of the most difficult component of rhinoplasty (2-9). CSG is the most preferred technique for correcting NT deformity. The CSG can help to support a central scaffold, correct asymmetry of the medial crura, provide much-needed support for lower lateral crura and also maintenance and optimization of tip projection (10,11). In this study, CSG was used for all patients depending on various reasons.

Tripod theory is a concept that involves changing the length of the alar cartilage to change the appearance of the NT. The role of both alar cartilages in the base dynamics is highlighted in this theory. A CSG can be placed between the medial crura along the caudal edge of cartilaginous septum to replace medial limb of the tripod (10). In this study, two different shapes of CSGs -a traditional CSG and a b-shaped CSG- were compared in terms of NT rotation. When postoperative NLAs were measured, 36.4% of the NLAs were above the optimal range in cases where the traditional strut was used. Wide NLAs were observed more frequently in cases where the traditional CSG was used than in cases where the b-shaped CSG was used. Both designs of CSG increased the projection of the nose after the operation in agreement with the literature (10,12,13). Therefore, the measurement of tip projection was not included in this study. However, the b-shaped CSG provided gains in projection without extended rotation. When a CSG is used, the NT position changes progressively during the healing period. It is generally believed that the final result is not seen until at least 12 months after rhinoplasty surgery (8). Therefore, the postoperative photos analyzed in this study were taken at least 12 months postoperatively.

The NT includes polygons and breakpoints, and the aesthetically pleasing reconstructed columella should also be designed as a geometric form that has angles similar to those of a natural columella (14). In our clinical experience, the columella is observed as a straight line in cases where a traditional CSG is used; therefore, in this study, a CSG was designed with a geometric shape different from that of the traditional CSG. We believe that the angled appearance of the columella cannot be obtained using a traditional columellar strut, which is prepared in the form of a straight strip. However, when a b-shaped CSG is used, a lateral view of the columella is more pleasing and natural.

Conclusion

The overall conclusion derived from this research is that an optimally shaped columella can be obtained by using a b-shaped CSG without over-rotation of the NT.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Engin Savaş MD, for measuring nasolabial angles.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The essential approval was obtained to use the hospital database. Ethical approval was obtained from the Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Medicine for the study (number: 08-07, date: 28/04/2021).

Informed Consent: Consents of patient were obtained from all our patients.

Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.

Financial Disclosure: The author declared that this study received no financial support.

References

Dhong ES, Kim YJ, Suh MK. L-shaped Columellar Strut in East Asian Nasal Tip plasty. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40(5):616-620.

Dobratz EJ, Tran V, Hilger PA. Comparison of Techniques Used to Support The Nasal Tip and Their Long-term Effects on Tip Position. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010;12(3):172-179.

Abu El-Wafa AM. Columellar strut: is it an integral step in primary rhinoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131(1):119-121.

Hidalgo DA, Doft MA. The Caudal Septum Columellar Strut Graft: An Alternative for Tip Support. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136(3):484-487.

Korkmaz M, Korkmaz H. The Comparison Between Alar Cartilage Shortening and Columellar-Septal Suture Techniques in Nasal Tip Rotation. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(3):876-880.

Sadeghi M, Saedi B, Sazegar AA, Amiri M. The Role of Columellar Struts to Gain and Maintain Tip Projection and Rotation: A Randomized Blinded Trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009;23(6):47-50.

Sahin MS, Kasapoglu F, Demir UL, Ozmen OA, Coskun H, Basut O. Comparison of Clinical Results in Nasal Tip Augmentation Either Via Face to Face or Back to Back Technique with Autogenous Auricular Conchal Cartilage. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(7):2109-2114.

Toncic R, Toncic D. Sublabial autologous ear cartilage grafting for increasing the nasolabial angle. Arch Plast Surg 2016:43(1):46-52.

Redstone JS, Chowdhry S, Nguyen J, North DA, Hazani R, Drury B, et al. Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim. Eplasty 2015;15:e19.

Bucher S, Kunz S, Deggeller M, Holzmann D, Soyka MB. Open rhinoplasty Using a Columellar strut: Effects of The Graft on Nasal Tip Projection and Rotation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277(5):1371-1377.

Rohrich RJ, Hoxworth RE, Kurkjian TJ. The Role of The Columellar Strut in Rhinoplasty: Indications and Rationale. Plasti Reconstr Surg 2012;129(1):118-125.

Carron MA, Zoumalan RA, Pastorek NJ. Measured Gain in Projection With The Extended Columellar Strut-tip Graft in Endonasal Rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013;15(3):187-191.

Akkus AM, Eryilmaz E, Guneren E. Comparison of The Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37(4):666-673.

Çakır B, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK. Surface Aesthetics in Tip Rhinoplasty: A Step-By-Step Guide. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34(6):941-955.

Management of Reconstruction of the Columella in Open Rhinoplasty Procedure: Using b-Shaped Columellar Strut Graft