Sıçanlarda Bistüri, Makas ve Koter Kullanılarak Kolon Diseksiyonlarında Anastomoz Güvenliğinin Karşılaştırılması: Deneysel Çalışma
PDF

Özgün Araştırma

Sıçanlarda Bistüri, Makas ve Koter Kullanılarak Kolon Diseksiyonlarında Anastomoz Güvenliğinin Karşılaştırılması: Deneysel Çalışma

Bagcilar Med Bull 2021;6(1):14-19 DOI: 10.4274/BMB.galenos.2020.08.048
, , , , ,
PDF
İzin

Öz

Amaç:

Postoperatif anastomoz kaçağı modern cerrahide hala bir sorundur. Postoperatif anastomoz kaçağı nedeniyle yeniden hastaneye yatış hastanede kalış süresini uzatır ve yeni ameliyatlar maliyeti artırır. Bağırsakların nasıl diseke edileceğine dair hala bir fikir birliği yoktur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sıçanlarda bistüri, makas ve koter kullanarak diseksiyon sonrası kolon anastomozlarının güvenliğini karşılaştırmaktır.

Yöntem:

Otuz iki yetişkin Wistar Hannover sıçanı rastgele olarak her biri 8 hayvan içeren 4 gruba ayrıldı: grup 1: sham grubu, grup 2: bistüri grubu, grup 3: makas grubu, grup 4: koter grubu. Anastomoz tek tek sütürler ile tek kat üzerinden yapıldı. Patlama basıncı 7. günde ölçüldü. Biyokimyasal ve histopatolojik parametrelerin değerlendirilmesi için doku ve kan örnekleri alındı.

Bulgular:

Sham, bistüri, makas ve koter grupları arasında patlama basıncı ortalaması, ortalama hidroksiprolin seviyeleri ve fibroz dağılımları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark tespit edildi.

Sonuç:

Hemostaz için koter en iyi seçimdir, ancak doku iyileşmesi düşünüldüğünde, neşter ve makas en güvenli alternatifler olarak bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Anastomoz kaçağı, doku iyileşmesi, hidroksiprolin, kolon diseksiyonu, sıçan

Kaynakça

1

Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H. A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 2012;14(10):e661-667.

2

Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y, Gao X, Patkar A. The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation on of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18(6):1176-1185.

3

Kivirikko KI, Laitinen O, Prockop DJ. Modifications of a specific assay for hydroxyproline in urine. Anal Biochem1967;19(2):249-255.

4

Verhofstad MH, Hendriks T. Diabetes impairs the development of early strength, but not the accumulation of collagen, during intestinal anastomotic healing in the rat. Br J Surg 1994;81(7):1040-1045.

5

Rolandelli RH, Koruda MJ, Settle RG, Rombeau JL. Effects of intraluminal infusion of short-chain fatty acids on the healing of colonic anastomosis in the rat. Surgery 1986;100(2):198-204.

6

Kruschewski M, Rieger H, Pohlen U, Hotz HG, Buhr HJ. Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage and postoperative mortality in elective surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22(8):919-927. (Epub 2007 Jan 27).

7

Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185(2):105-113.

8

Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85(3):355-358.

9

Yesilkaya Y, Soyhan N, Bengisu N, Sen M, Aritas Y. The effects of different suture techniques on collagen metabolism in experimental distal colonic anastomoses. Br J Surg 1985;72(12):987-989.

10

Aysan E, Dincel O, Bektas H, Alkan M. Polypropilen mesh covered colonic anastomosis. Results of a new anastomosis technique. Int J Surg 2008;6(3):224-229.

11

Aysan E, Bektas H, Ersoz F, Sari S, Kaygusuz A. A novel colonic anastomosis technique involving fixed poly-glycolic acid mesh. Int J Clin Exp Med 2010;3(4):341-346.

12

Glover JL, Bendick PJ, Link WJ. The use of thermal knives in surgery: electrosurgery, lasers, plasma scalpel. Curr Probl Surg 1978;15(1):1-78.

13

Gushing H. Electro-surgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors: with a preliminary note on a new surgical current generator by W.T. Bovie, Ph.D, Chicago. Surg Gyn Obstet 1928;47(1928):751-784.

14

Harrington DP. Electrosurgery fact and fiction. Biomed Instrum Technol 1994;28(4):331-333.

15

Rappaport WD, Hunter GC, Allen R, Lick S, Halldorsson A, Chvapil T, et al. Effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Am J Surg 1990;160(6):618-620.

16

Hochberg J, Murray GF. Principles of operative surgery. In Textbook of surgery, Sabiston DC, Lyerly HK (editors) 15th ed., Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992:253-263.

17

Soballe PW, Nimbkar NV, Hayward I, Nielsen TB, Drucker WR. Electric cautery lowers the contamination threshold for infection of laparotomies. Am J Surg 1998;175(4):263-266.

18

Groot G, Chappell EW. Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates. Am J Surg 1994;167(6):601-603.

19

Aslan A, Temiz M, Hakverdi S, Polat G, Tumer C, Temiz A, et al. Effect of mesalamine on healing in experimental colon anastomosis: a randomized experimental study. Int J Surg 2008;6(1):40-44. (Epub 2008 Feb 20).

20

Rijcken E, Sachs L, Fuchs T, Spiegel HU, Neumann PA. Growth factors and gastrointestinal anastomotic healing. J Surg Res 2014;187(1):202-210. (Epub 2013 Oct 12).

21

Agren MS, Andersen TL, Mirastschijski U, Syk I, Schiødt CB, Surve V, et al. Action of matrix metalloproteinases at restricted sites in colon anastomosis repair: an immunohistochemical and biochemical study. Surgery 2006;140(1):72-82.

22

Christensen H, Chemnitz J, Christensen BC, Oxlund H. Collagen structural organization of healing colonic anastomoses and the effect of growth hormone treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38(11):1200-1205.

23

Oxlund H, Christensen H, Seyer-Hansen M, Andreassen TT. Collagen deposition and mechanical strength of colon anastomoses and skin incisional wounds of rats. J Surg Res 1996;66(1):25-30.

24

Øines MN, Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Agren MS. Pharmacological interventions for improved colonic anastomotic healing: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(35):12637-12648.

25

Erginel B, Erginel T, Aksoy B, Dokucu AI. Effect of ozone therapy (OT) on healing of colonic anastomosis in a rat model of peritonitis. Balkan Med J 2014;31(3):249-253.

26

Rolandelli RH, Koruda MJ, Setle RG, Rombeau JL. Effects of intraluminal infusion of short-chain fatty acids on healing of colonic anastomosis in rat. Surgery 1986;100(2):198-204.

27

Senol M, Altintas MM, Cevik A, Altuntas YE, Barisik NO, Bildik N, et al. The effect of fibrin glue on the intensity of colonic anastomosis in the presence and absence of peritonitis: an experimental randomized controlled trial on rats. ISRN Surg 2013;2013:1e6, 521413. (Epub 2013 Jan 21).

28

Kemik O, Adas G, Arikan S, Gurluler YD, Toklu AS, Kapran Y, et al. Evaluation of the effects of hyperbaric oxygen treatment and enoxaparin on left colon anastomosis. An experimental study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17(17):2286-2292.

29

Arikanoglu Z, Cetinkaya Z, Akbulut S, Ilhan YS, Aygen E, Basbug M, et al. The effect of different suture materials on the safety of colon anastomosis in an experimental peritonitis model. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17(19):2587-2593.

30

Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77(3):549-573.

31

Brenner DA, O’Hara M, Angel P, Chojkier M, Karin M. Prolonged activation of jun and collagenase genes by tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Nature 1989;337(6208):661-663.

32

Cohen SR, Cornell CN, Collins MH, Sell JE, Blanc WA, Altman RP. Healing of ischemic colonic anastomoses in the rat: role of antibiotic preparation. Surgery 1985;97(4):443-446.

33

Furst MB, Stromberg BV, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG. Colonic anastomoses: bursting strength after corticosteroid treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(1):12-15.